Daniel N. Rios v. Mark Henry, Warden

9 F.3d 1553 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Daniel N. RIOS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Mark HENRY, Warden, et al., Respondents-Appellees. No. 93-55061. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 1, 1993. * Decided Nov. 9, 1993. 1 Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Daniel N. Rios appeals pro se the district court's dismissal without prejudice of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for writ of habeas corpus seeking removal of an Immigration and Naturalization Service ("INS") detainer against him. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review the district court's dismissal de novo, see United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.1984) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 (1984), and we affirm. 4 Rios contends that because the INS's detainer increased his security classification and rendered him ineligible for many prison programs, and because the INS did not commence…