Manuel Agusto Santamaria-Ames v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

9 F.3d 1553 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Manuel Agusto SANTAMARIA-AMES, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70200. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 8, 1993. * Decided Oct. 14, 1993. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing Nov. 15, 1993. 1 Before: HALL and RYMER, Circuit Judges, and FITZGERALD, ** District Judge 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Manuel Agusto Santamaria-Ames petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). Santamaria argues that in denying his petition for a waiver of deportation under § 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (c), the BIA failed to properly consider certain equities in his favor, applied an erroneous legal standard, abused its discretion, and committed procedural violations. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a, and we deny the petition for review. 4 * Section 212(c) permits relief from…