United States v. James Ralph D'Ambrosio

9 F.3d 1554 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Ralph D'AMBROSIO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10526. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 30, 1993. Decided Oct. 14, 1993. 1 Before: D.W. NELSON and NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and BELLONI, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 A jury found defendant James Ralph D'Ambrosio guilty of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a). On appeal, defendant argues that there was insufficient identification evidence to sustain the verdict. We affirm. 4 On March 1, 1990, the Santa Barbara Savings and Loan was robbed. The robber, donning a ski mask, was filmed by bank cameras. An anonymous tip led the FBI to investigate defendant as a suspect for the robbery. Pursuant to consent searches, law enforcement officials found a pair of blue jeans, black shoes, and combs in defendant's suitcase and room. The trial evidence consisted of a…