United States v. Anthony Demichael

Good Law
9 F.3d 1554·1993 WL 435587·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 36975
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 27, 199393-10157California870 words

Opinion

Opinion

9 F.3d 1554 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony DeMICHAEL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10157. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 20, 1993. * Decided Oct. 27, 1993. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Anthony DeMichael appeals his conviction, which followed a jury trial, for two counts of interfering with a flight crew member in violation of 49 U.S.C. § 1472 (j). DeMichael argues that the district court abused its discretion by allowing the government to introduce testimony that he harassed guests and struck a security officer at a hotel within a few hours after he was arrested for the conduct at issue in this appeal. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review for abuse of discretion the district court's decision to admit evidence of other conduct under Fed.R.Evid. 404(b). United States v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.