United States v. Jacqueline Hendricks

Good Law
9 F.3d 1554·1993 WL 436883
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 27, 199392-37009California560 words

Opinion

Opinion

9 F.3d 1554 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jacqueline HENDRICKS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-37009. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 20, 1993. * Decided Oct. 27, 1993. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jacqueline Hendricks, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition to vacate her sentence. Hendricks pleaded guilty in 1989 to conspiracy to distribute and possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1), 841(b)(1)(B), 846. Hendricks argues that the district court erred by enhancing her sentence based on her perjury at a suppression hearing and by failing to grant her a downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility. She argues further that the Government failed to disclose evidence that showed she played a minimal role in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.