United States v. Alton Crisp

9 F.3d 1554 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alton CRISP, Defendant-Appellant. No. 89-50289. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 20, 1993. * Decided Oct. 27, 1993. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Alton Crisp appeals his conviction following a jury trial for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1), 846. Crisp contends the district court erred by (1) admitting without proper foundation in-court identification testimony and (2) denying his motion for judgment of acquittal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 3 * Officer Williams' Identification of Crisp 4 Crisp contends the district court erred when it permitted a government witness, Officer Charles Williams, to identify Crisp in court on the basis of having heard Crisp's voice during the…