United States v. Lamont Duane "Monte" Jack

Good Law
9 F.3d 1554·1993 WL 438710·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 36964
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 29, 199392-30409California1,335 words

Opinion

Opinion

9 F.3d 1554 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lamont Duane "Monte" JACK, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30409. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 7, 1993. Decided Oct. 29, 1993. Before: GOODWIN, SCHROEDER, and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * OVERVIEW 2 Lamont Duane "Monte" Jack was convicted by a jury of conspiracy to commit robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951 , attempted robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1951-52 , and use of a firearm during the commission of the other charged offenses, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c)(1). Jack's sole codefendant, Randy D. Baldwin, was acquitted on all counts, including conspiracy to commit robbery. The district court sentenced Jack to 108 months' imprisonment. 3 On appeal Jack contends that the district court erred (1) by denying his post-trial motion for acquittal, (2) by denying his motion for new…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.