United States v. Demond Clay Harrison

9 F.3d 1554 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Demond Clay HARRISON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50250. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 1, 1993. * Decided Nov. 8, 1993. Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Demond Clay Harrison appeals his convictions following a conditional guilty plea to armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a)(d) and use of a firearm in connection with the robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c). Harrison contends the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a warrantless search of his bedroom. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review for clear error the voluntariness of a consent to search. United States v. Kelley, 953 F.2d 562, 566 (9th Cir.1992). It is unclear whether we review de novo or for clear error a…