United States v. Jerome Enrico Cuie, Jr.

Good Law
9 F.3d 1554·1993 WL 455177·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 36988
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 5, 199392-30469California378 words

Opinion

Opinion

9 F.3d 1554 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerome Enrico CUIE, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30469. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 1, 1993. * Decided Nov. 5, 1993. Before: REINHARDT, BRUNETTI and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jerome Enrico Cuie, Jr. challenges the district court's imposition of a five-year mandatory minimum sentence pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 841 (b)(1)(B)(iii) (" § 841(b)(1)(B)(iii)") and requests that his sentence be vacated and his case remanded for resentencing under 21 U.S.C. § 841 (b)(1)(C) (" § 841(b)(1)(C)"). Cuie contends that because the amount of cocaine he pled guilty to possessing with intent to distribute (13.82 grams) was not included in the indictment, the district court's application of the five-year mandatory minimum sentence under § 841(b)(1)(B)(iii) was improper. Cuie maintains that absent specific…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.