United States v. Keith A. Grimes
Opinion
Opinion
9 F.3d 1554 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Keith A. GRIMES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50116. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 7, 1993. * Decided Oct. 22, 1993. Before: KOZINSKI, SILER, ** and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 We previously vacated Grimes' sentence and remanded for resentencing because of the trial judge's failure to resolve the dispute concerning the amount of money lost by the victims and for failure to set a specific restitution amount. United States v. Grimes, No. 87-5290 (9th Cir. Dec. 12, 1990). 3 On remand, the parties stipulated that the amount lost by the victims was less than one million dollars, but they did not stipulate to any exact dollar figure. People would be affected by whether the loss exceeded one million dollars. The trial judge reimposed Grimes' twelve year sentence, and ordered restitution in the amount of $100,000. 4 I. Amount…