United States v. Ronald Peter Liquori, Sr.

9 F.3d 1554 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald Peter LIQUORI, Sr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50727. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 20, 1993. * Decided Oct. 27, 1993. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ronald Peter Liquori, Sr. appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e) motion to return $1,260 in U.S. currency seized pursuant to the search of his son's house. Liquori contends he was deprived of his property as the result of an illegal search and he never received notice of the forfeiture proceedings. 1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we vacate and remand. 3 Here, federal agents executed a search warrant at 8424 Stansbury St., Spring Valley, California, the residence of Liquori's son. Liquori was present during the search, and the agents seized $1,260.00 from Liquori's pockets. An…