United States v. Jose De La Jara, AKA Jose Alberto Fernandez

9 F.3d 1554 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose DE LA JARA, aka Jose Alberto Fernandez, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-50157, 93-50159. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 6, 1993. * Decided Oct. 22, 1993. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jose De La Jara appeals his sentence under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. De La Jara pled guilty to mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 , and aiding and abetting currency structuring, in violation of 31 U.S.C. § 5324 and 18 U.S.C. § 2 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review the district court's findings of fact for clear error. 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (e); United States v. Howard, 894 F.2d 1085, 1087 (9th Cir.1990), and we affirm. 3 De La Jara contends that the district court erred in imposing a fine of $200,000 because there is no evidence in the…