United States v. Ronald L. Rushton

9 F.3d 1555 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald L. RUSHTON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-15544. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 20, 1993. * Decided Oct. 26, 1993. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Federal prisoner Ronald L. Rushton appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion to vacate, set aside or amend his sentence, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 , following his guilty plea to six counts of a 73-count indictment for various charges relating to a scheme involving fraudulent applications for credit cards. Rushton claims that the district court erred in not sentencing him under the Sentencing Guidelines, his counsel was ineffective in advising him concerning his sentence, and his guilty plea was not voluntary and informed pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . We…