United States v. Robert Rouland

9 F.3d 1555 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert ROULAND, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10253. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Oct. 14, 1993. * Before: FERGUSON, THOMPSON, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** OVERVIEW 2 Robert Rouland appeals his sentence, following our affirmance of his convictions and remand for resentencing. He argues that the district court improperly denied his motion for recusal, his motion to disqualify the entire United States Attorney's Office, and his motion to strike the presentence report. He also claims that the district court imposed a sentence that was unconstitutionally disparate to codefendant Raul Martinez. 3 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (a)(1) and we affirm. STANDARD OF REVIEW 4 We review Rouland's recusal, prosecutorial disqualification, and disparate sentencing claims for abuse of discretion. Molina…