United States v. Michael James Riconosciuto

9 F.3d 1555 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael James RICONOSCIUTO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30200. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 31, 1993. * Decided Oct. 27, 1993. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, BOOCHEVER, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Michael Riconosciuto appeals his conviction and sentence for various narcotics offenses, including conspiracy to manufacture and distribute methamphetamine, distribution of methamphetamine and methadone, and possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine. He argues that the district court erred by (1) admitting evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment; (2) failing to find that the government's destruction of evidence violated due process; and (3) sentencing him based on an erroneous calculation of the amount of drugs involved in the offenses. We affirm. I. Fourth Amendment Claim 3 Riconosciuto argues…