United States v. Eduardo Zapata-Galvez

9 F.3d 1555 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eduardo ZAPATA-GALVEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50457. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 4, 1993. Decided Oct. 25, 1993. Before: SKOPIL, HALL, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Eduardo Zapata-Galvez (Zapata) appeals his conviction for possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 and conspiracy to possess cocaine with the intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 . 3 * Zapata contends that the affidavit in support of the Claret Street warrant failed to establish probable cause because it relied exclusively on innocent activity. 4 "Probable cause exists when, considering the totality of the circumstances, 'there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.' " United States v. Ocampo, 937 F.2d 485, 490 (9th…