United States v. Real Property Identified as 214 Park Ave. North, Renton, Wash.

Good Law
9 F.3d 1555·1993 WL 410447·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 37002
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 14, 199392-35024California555 words

Opinion

Opinion

9 F.3d 1555 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. REAL PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS 214 PARK AVENUE NORTH, RENTON, WASHINGTON, its Buildings, Improvements, Appurtenances, Fixtures, Attachments and Easements, Defendant, and Coskun Ateser and Beverly Ateser, Claimants-Appellants. No. 92-35024. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 1, 1993. Decided Oct. 14, 1993. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, WRIGHT and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 The Atesers appeal from the district court's order directing the return of their property, granting the government a certificate of reasonable cause and denying the Atesers' fees and costs. Because this order was a final order, we have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . The Atesers do not challenge the merits of the order. They raise only procedural issues concerning the certificate of reasonable cause. We affirm. Rule 59(e) 3 Rule 59(e)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.