Bricker v. Rockwell International Corporation

Good Law
10 F.3d 598·93 Daily Journal DAR 13451·10 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 51·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 27585·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7874
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 25, 199391-36153California4,507 words

Opinion

Opinion

10 F.3d 598 Edwin L. BRICKER; Cynthia Bricker, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION; Rockwell Hanford Corporation; Westinghouse Corporation; Westinghouse Hanford Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-36153. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 12, 1993. Decided Oct. 25, 1993. Thad Guyer, T.M. Guyer & Friends, P.C., Medford, OR, Michael E. Withey, Schroeter, Goldmark & Bender, Seattle, WA, for plaintiffs-appellants. David F. Jurca, Helsell, Mark F. Rising, Fetterman, Martin, Todd & Hokanson, Seattle, WA, for appellee Rockwell Intern. Corp. William R. Squires III, Stuart R. Dunwoody, and Bergitta K. Trelstad, Davis Wright Tremaine, Seattle, WA, and Robert A. Dutton, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Westinghouse Hanford Co., Richland, WA, for defendant/appellee Westinghouse Hanford Co. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, Alan A. McDonald, District Judge, Presiding. Before: CANBY, WIGGINS and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. CANBY, Circuit Judge: 1 Edwin and Cynthia Bricker appeal the district court's summary judgment in favor of the defendants in the Brickers'…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.