Cecelia Packing Corporation v. United States Department Of Agriculture/Agricultural Marketing Service

Good Law
10 F.3d 616·93 Daily Journal DAR 14782·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30032·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8584
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 22, 199392-15671California5,476 words

Opinion

Opinion

10 F.3d 616 62 USLW 2357 CECELIA PACKING CORPORATION, a California corporation, Plaintiff, Harris Farms, Inc., a California corporation; Kencarol, Inc., a California corporation; John Doe One; John Doe Two, a California corporation; and John Doe Three, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE/AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE; Sunkist Growers, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-15671. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 13, 1993. Decided Nov. 22, 1993. James A. Moody, Washington, DC, Brian C. Leighton, Fresno, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants. Robert M. Loeb, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC; Michael H. Bierman, Tuttle & Taylor, Los Angeles, CA, for defendants-appellees. James S. Krzyminski, Washington, DC, for amicus curiae. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Before: SNEED, POOLE, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. TROTT, Circuit Judge: 1 This case involves Constitutional challenges to 7 U.S.C. Sec. 608c(12) (1988), the provision of the Agriculture Marketing Agreement Act of 1937 ("AMAA") that requires the Secretary of Agriculture to consider the vote of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.