Gaskell v. Weir

Good Law
10 F.3d 626·93 Daily Journal DAR 14773·27 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 609·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30031·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8588
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 22, 199392-16769California2,032 words

Opinion

Opinion

10 F.3d 626 27 Fed.R.Serv.3d 609 Fred R. GASKELL, et al., Plaintiffs, and Richard A. Canatella, Appellant, v. S.L. WEIR; Leo J. Schiavello; Christina C. Schiavello; Michael D. Meadows; Taylor & Meadows; Kenneth P. Gray, Esq.; Pamela W. Levin; Susan E. Hayes; Thornton, Taylor, Downs & Becker, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16769. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 6, 1993. Decided Nov. 22, 1993. Richard A. Canatella, pro se and Murray B. Petersen, Oakland, CA, for appellant. Roger J. Brothers, McNamara, Houston, Dodge, McClure & Ney, Walnut Creek, CA, for defendants-appellees Leo and Christina Schiavello, Michael Meadows, and Taylor & Meadows. Jeffrey S. Salisbury, Bowles & Verna, Walnut Creek, CA, for defendant-appellee Kenneth Gray. Otto F. Becker and Clarke B. Holland, Thornton, Taylor, Downs, Becker, Tolson & Doherty, San Francisco, CA, for defendants-appellees Pamela Levin, Susan Hayes, and Thornton, Taylor, Downs & Becker. James V. Fitzgerald, III, Sellar, Hazard, Snyder, Kelly & Fitzgerald, Walnut Creek, CA, for defendant-appellee S.L. Weir. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.