Go-Video, Inc. v. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co., Ltd.

10 F.3d 808 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. GO-VIDEO, INC., an Arizona Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MATSUSHITA ELECTRICAL INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., Victor Company of Japan, Ltd., Sony Corporation, the Motion Picture Association of America, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16387. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 3, 1993 * . Decided Nov. 26, 1993. Before: ALARCON, LEAVY AND KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 This is an appeal from the award of costs. 3 Although the depositions were videotaped, the parties stipulated that the stenographic transcripts, not the videotapes, would be the "official record." Under this stipulation, the parties had not agreed that the depositions were to be "recorded by other then stenographic means" in the sense of Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(b)(4). Rather, they agreed that the depositions would be officially recorded by stenography, but allowed any party to obtain a videotape at its own expense. 4 The…