McGee v. County of Los Angeles

10 F.3d 808 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charisse McGEE; June S. McGee; Marvin McGee; Martha Sweet, through her conservator, June McGee, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; Los Angeles County Public Guardian; Visiting Nurses Association of Pasadena & San Gabriel; Carol De Souza; Huntington Memorial Hospital; City of Pasadena; James Robenson; Douglas Misch; Eric McWilliams; Yvette McDowell; Kevin La Presle, et al., David Dahl, M.D.; Frederick McKay, M.D., et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-55421. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 4, 1993. * Decided Nov. 15, 1993. Before: SKOPIL, BOOCHEVER and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 We affirm the district court's order dismissing the action by June McGee. 3 McGee first argues that there was an ongoing conspiracy among all defendants to prevent her from regaining custody of Martha Sweet. This argument is immaterial to this case since McGee and the other…