Simon Julio Antezana-Siles v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

10 F.3d 808 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Simon Julio ANTEZANA-SILES, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70397. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 2, 1993 * . Decided Nov. 26, 1993. Before: ALARCON, LEAVY and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Petitioner argues that the State Department letter did not fulfill statutory requirements, because it appears to be a form letter. We reject this argument because he does not identify the statute violated, and we cannot find such a statute. Petitioner identifies a regulation, 8 C.F.R. Sec. 208.10(b), but it contains no language requiring a more specific or complete opinion than the one provided. 3 Nor has petitioner demonstrated that the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision was unsupported by substantial evidence. He did not present evidence so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find a well-founded fear of…