Toyota Landscaping Company, Inc. v. Southern California District Council Of Laborers

Good Law
11 F.3d 114·93 Daily Journal DAR 15110·144 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2824·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 31130·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8825
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 1, 199391-55721California2,578 words

Opinion

Opinion

11 F.3d 114 144 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2824 , 127 Lab.Cas. P 10,964 TOYOTA LANDSCAPING COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DISTRICT COUNCIL OF LABORERS; Affiliated Laborers Local Union 652; Affiliated Laborers Local Union 300; Affiliated Laborers Local Union 1082, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 91-55721, 91-55986. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 5, 1993. Decided Dec. 1, 1993. Scott A. Wilson, Littler, Mendelson, Fastiff & Tichy, San Diego, CA, for plaintiff-appellant. Alexander B. Cvitan, Reich, Adell & Crost, Los Angeles, CA, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before: FLETCHER, PREGERSON, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. PREGERSON, Circuit Judge: 1 Toyota Landscaping Company, Inc. ("Toyota Landscaping") appeals the district court's judgment in favor of the Southern California District Council of Laborers and three laborers local unions (collectively referred to as "Laborers Union"). Toyota Landscaping contended that a subcontracting clause in the Laborers Union's collective bargaining agreement with associations of Southern California general…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.