Gerald W. Bergford v. Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service

Good Law
12 F.3d 166·93 Daily Journal DAR 16195·73 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 498·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 33073·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9416
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 21, 199392-70241California2,728 words

Opinion

Opinion

12 F.3d 166 73 A.F.T.R.2d 94 -498, 94-1 USTC P 50,004 Gerald W. and Geraldine M. BERGFORD, William G. and Barbara Alhouse, John N. and Nancy M. Damas, William A. and Judith Tauskey, and Monte S. and Jerilyn F. Preece, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent-Appellee. Nos. 92-70241, 92-70242, 92-70443, 92-70445 and 92-70519. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 3, 1993. * Decided Dec. 21, 1993. Andrew I. Fogler, Eisenberg Honig Fogler Dimas & Johnston, New York City, for petitioners-appellants. Gary R. Allen, Richard Farber, Sally J. Schornstheimer, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Tax Div., Washington, DC, for respondent-appellee. Appeal from a Decision of the United States Tax Court. Before: TANG, FARRIS, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. RYMER, Circuit Judge: 1 This appeal requires us to decide whether the arrangement between owners of computer equipment and the manager of a sale-leaseback program to finance, purchase, lease, and remarket the equipment is a partnership subject to the unified audit and litigation provisions for partnership items under Secs. 6221-6233 of the Internal Revenue Code. The five actions that are the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.