Christine Holt Spinelli v. Michael Gaughan

Bad Law
12 F.3d 853·93 Daily Journal DAR 15573·1993 WL 502591·17 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2006·9 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 214
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 9, 199392-15428California2,592 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kozinski, J.

Appellant Christine Holt Spinelli sued claiming she was fired in retaliation for exercising her rights under ERISA. We consider whether she was entitled to a jury trial.

I

Prior to her discharge, Spinelli served as a bartender at the Gold Coast Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas, Nevada. On July 19, twelve days before being fired, she wrote a letter to Michael Gaughan, the managing partner of Gold Coast. In this letter, Spinelli sought certain information about the -health plan serving Gold Coast’s employees. A return receipt shows Spinelli’s letter arrived on July 26. On July 31, she was fired. She never received a response to her letter.

In the district court, Spinelli claimed that the timing was more than a. coincidence, that she was fired for calling her employer to task about employee benefits. The employer responded that Spinelli was fired for légiti-mate reasons which we need not discuss here. Suffice it to say the record amply supports the district court’s finding that Spi-nelli was not discharged in retaliation for exercising rights under ERISA, although it would have supported a contrary finding as well. Since there was, so to speak, a horse race, it became’ significant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.