Intel Corporation v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

Good Law
12 F.3d 908·93 Daily Journal DAR 16597·1993 WL 532738·29 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1363·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 33639
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 28, 199392-16899California3,521 words

Opinion

Opinion

Reinhardt, J.

Intel Corporation (Intel) appeals the district court’s order staying its copyright action against Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD). The stay was granted pending final state court appellate review of an arbitration award of license that, if upheld, would provide AMD with a defense to Intel’s claims of copyright infringement. Because we do not find that exceptional circumstances exist justifying a “wise judicial administration” stay under Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States, 424 U.S. 800 , 96 S.Ct. 1236 , 47 L.Ed.2d 483 (1976), and because the stay cannot be upheld on the alternative grounds suggested by AMD, we reverse the stay order and remand to the district court for further proceedings.

BACKGROUND

Intel and AMD are semi-conductor companies which design, produce and market microprocessors. A' common practice within the microprocessor industry is the “second sourcing” arrangement, by which the creator of a newly developed product will license rights to manufacture the product to another company, receiving a royalty in return. Although both companies then market the same product in competition with one another, the existence of a second source for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.