Henry Anderson v. Wes Gebb Environmental Health Department Valentina Reiner

Good Law
12 F.3d 1105·1993 WL 524137·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 36464
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 15, 199393-15527California257 words

Opinion

Opinion

12 F.3d 1105 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Henry ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Wes GEBB; Environmental Health Department; Valentina Reiner, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15527. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 6, 1993. * Decided Dec. 15, 1993. Before: SNEED, NOONAN and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Henry Anderson appeals the district court's dismissal of his complaint. The court also imposed a $618.45 Rule 11 sanction, declared Anderson a vexatious litigant and prohibited him from making any future related filings without permission from the chief judge. We affirm. 3 Because Anderson's perjury and fraud claims were or could have been raised in earlier actions, his claims are barred by the doctrine of res judicata. Federated Department Stores v. Moitie, 452 U.S. 394, 398 (1981). Also, his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 claims are barred by the statute of limitations. His claims arising from the 1982 inspection expired by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.