In Re James Constant, Debtor. (Two Cases) James Constant v. Stephen v. Wilson, District Judge Manuel Real, Chief District Judge Robert P. Aguilar Oscar Davis Wilson Cowen, Judge Edward Smith Helen Nies Pauline Newman Howard Markey Paul Michel United States of America, (Three Cases)
Opinion
Opinion
12 F.3d 1105 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re James CONSTANT, Debtor. (Two Cases) James CONSTANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Stephen V. WILSON, District Judge; Manuel Real, Chief District Judge; Robert P. Aguilar; Oscar Davis; Wilson Cowen, Judge; Edward Smith; Helen Nies; Pauline Newman; Howard Markey; Paul Michel; United States of America, Defendants-Appellees. (Three Cases) Nos. 92-55891, 92-56045 and 92-55995. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 17, 1993. * Decided Dec. 3, 1993. Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In these consolidated appeals, James Constant appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of three actions Constant filed against ten federal judges. Constant also appeals the district court's order enjoining him from filing further papers without prior court approval. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 3 The history of Constant's…