Gary Dale Brymer v. Tom Agnos Copeland, Officer, Sgt. Fletcher and Mail & Property Personal, Etc.

Good Law
12 F.3d 1105·1993 WL 478407·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 36451
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 199392-16721California914 words

Opinion

Opinion

12 F.3d 1105 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Gary Dale BRYMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tom AGNOS; Copeland, Officer, Sgt. Fletcher and Mail & Property Personal, etc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16721. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 4, 1993. * Decided Nov. 18, 1993. 1 Before: CANBY AND NOONAN, CIRCUIT JUDGES AND ORRICK, ** DISTRICT JUDGE. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Gary Brymer brought suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 against various employees of the Maricopa County Sheriff's Department for allegedly opening and delaying delivery, for three days, 1 of a letter from his attorney. The district court granted summary judgment for defendants, finding that Brymer had not demonstrated an injury to his constitutional rights. We affirm. 4 * We review de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment. Miller v. Newbauer, 862 F.2d 771 (9th Cir.1988). 5 In granting judgment for the defendants, the district court stated that: 6 only a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.