Charles Michael Byers v. United States Navy

Good Law
12 F.3d 1105·1993 WL 495578·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 36453
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 29, 199393-15121California817 words

Opinion

Opinion

12 F.3d 1105 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charles Michael BYERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES NAVY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-15121. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 17, 1993. Decided Nov. 29, 1993. Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Charles M. Byers appeals pro se the district court's denial of his third motion for reconsideration of the court's summary judgment in favor of the government in Byers's action under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Byers contends that the United States Navy failed to deliver all of the information he requested. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 The district court may reconsider its grant of summary judgment under either Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) (motion to alter or amend a judgment) or Rule 60(b) (relief from judgment). Under either theory, we review a denial of a motion to reconsider for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.