Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. Bruce St. J. Lilliston, AKA Bruce Lilliston, and Katie Lilliston

12 F.3d 1106 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, in its corporate capacity, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bruce ST. J. LILLISTON, AKA Bruce Lilliston, and Katie Lilliston, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-55532. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 5, 1993. Decided Dec. 2, 1993. Before: FLETCHER, D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and WILL, District Judge. * MEMORANDUM ** The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment to the Lillistons. The court held that the FDIC was suing the Lillistons on a note dated September 9, 1986, and that it was undisputed that the only note bearing that date had been repaid in full. In addition, the court refused to allow the FDIC to amend its complaint. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We reverse and remand. I. Jurisdiction is Proper The Lillistons contest this court's jurisdiction over their appeal,…