East Columbia Basin Irrigation District, Quincy-Columbia Basin Irrigation District South Columbia Basin Irrigation District v. United States

12 F.3d 1106 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. EAST COLUMBIA BASIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT, Quincy-Columbia Basin Irrigation District; South Columbia Basin Irrigation District, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-36312. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 8, 1993. Decided Dec. 15, 1993. 1 Before: BRUNETTI, LEAVY, and TROTT, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM * 3 Appellants East Columbia Basin Irrigation District and South Columbia Basin District ("the Districts") appeal from the district court's grant of summary judgment to the United States. The Districts argue the formula for setting the Districts' power rate set forth in Article 22(c) of the 1968 Repayment Contract ("the contract") between the Districts and the United States includes the power generated at the Right, Left and Third Powerplants located at Grand Coulee Dam. The district court determined the formula in Article 22(c) of the…