Harrison v. Adler

12 F.3d 1106 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. David S. HARRISON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tom ADLER; Gary Jenkins; Andrew Jenkins, a Minor by and through Gary Jenkins, his Guardian ad Litem; David B. Moon, Jr.; Does 1 through 100, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-55499. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 17, 1993. * Decided Nov. 29, 1993. Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 David S. Harrison appeals pro se the district court's dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction of Harrison's action for damages against Gary and Andrew Jenkins, their attorney, Tom Adler, and Superior Court Judge Moon. Harrison alleged that the defendants conspired to violate his constitutional rights by manipulating a state court proceeding. The district court granted Harrison's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed his action prior to service of process. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291…