Mark F. Durbin v. Colleen S. Durbin Larry Alan Lehmbecker Harry Slusher, Family Court Commissioner
Opinion
Opinion
12 F.3d 1106 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mark F. DURBIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Colleen S. DURBIN; Larry Alan Lehmbecker; Harry Slusher, Family Court Commissioner, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35426. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 5, 1993. * Decided Nov. 19, 1993. Before: CHOY, GOODWIN and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Mark F. Durbin appeals pro se the district court's orders (1) dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 civil rights claims against his ex-wife and her attorney; (2) dismissing Durbin's section 1983 claims against King County Superior Court Commissioner Harry Slusher; and (3) denying Durbin's motion for a preliminary injunction. We affirm. 3 Durbin's complaint alleged that a civil contempt order entered against him for violating a child support decree violates the Thirteenth Amendment and the Anti-Peonage Act. The district court correctly dismissed his action for failure to state a claim. 1 4 First,…