Robert Lee Jennings v. Samuel A. Lewis, Director

Good Law
12 F.3d 1106·1993 WL 524130·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 36494
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 15, 199393-15674California1,510 words

Opinion

Opinion

12 F.3d 1106 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert Lee JENNINGS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel A. LEWIS, Director, et al., Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-15674. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 6, 1993. * Decided Dec. 15, 1993. Before: SNEED, NOONAN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert Lee Jennings, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendant prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Jennings contends that (1) he was subjected to racial discrimination; (2) his personal property was confiscated, tampered with, and destroyed; and (3) he was retaliated against for exercising his constitutional rights. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and review de novo. Smolen v. Deloitte, Haskins & Sells, 921 F.2d 959, 963 (9th Cir.1990). We affirm. 3 Summary judgment is proper if the evidence, read in the light most favorable to the nonmoving…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.