Edward Joseph Davis v. George S. May International Company

12 F.3d 1106 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Edward Joseph DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GEORGE S. MAY INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-15521. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 17, 1993. * Decided Nov. 30, 1993. Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Edward Joseph Davis appeals pro se the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of George S. May International Company (GSMIC) in his employment discrimination action alleging race and sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e et seq. (Title VII), and age discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. Sec. 621 et seq. (ADEA). 1 Davis contends the district court erred by finding either that he had failed to establish a prima facie case of disparate treatment regarding GSMIC's decision not to hire him or that GSMIC's stated reasons…