Guam Paradise Co. v. Mitsubishi Corp., Ltd.

12 F.3d 1106 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. GUAM PARADISE CO., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MITSUBISHI CORPORATION, LTD., Mitsubishi International Corporation, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd., and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries of America, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16714. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 2, 1993. Decided Nov. 29, 1993. Before: POOLE, WIGGINS, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Causation is an essential element in Guam Paradise Company's (GPC's) claim for intentional interference with prospective economic advantage. Buckaloo v. Johnson, 537 P.2d 865, 872 (Cal.1975); see also Los Angeles Land Co. v. Brunswick Corp., No. 92-55134, slip op. at 11642-43 (9th Cir. October 13, 1993). GPC offers no significant, probative evidence to establish that it was reasonably probable it would have obtained the contract with the Port Authority of Guam but for Mitsubishi's wrongful interference. The…