Calvin Raye Hamrick v. United States

12 F.3d 1106 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Calvin Raye HAMRICK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-36533. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 6, 1993. * Decided Nov. 19, 1993. 1 Before: PREGERSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges, and INGRAM, Senior District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Hamrick appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion to vacate or correct his sentence. He challenges his sentence on the grounds that the district court failed to comply with the terms of the plea agreement, and he claims that the district court failed to comply with Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(c)(3)(D) by failing to append a copy of its order amending the presentence report to the copy of the report forwarded to the Bureau of Prisons. Hamrick's challenge of his sentence is without merit, and although under Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(c)(3)(D) the district court is required to append a copy of its order…