Istvan Kele v. United States Parole Commission

Good Law
12 F.3d 1106·1993 WL 478937·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 36472
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 199393-55894California1,235 words

Opinion

Opinion

12 F.3d 1106 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Istvan KELE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellee. No. 93-55894. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 17, 1993. * Decided Nov. 18, 1993. Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Istvan Kele, a federal prisoner, appeals from the denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 habeas corpus petition. Kele contends that the United States Parole Commission acted outside its statutory authority and denied him due process by revoking his parole based upon unauthorized possession of firearms. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 . We reverse the district court's judgment and remand with instructions to issue the writ. 3 Kele was released on parole on November 22, 1989, after serving sixteen years of a sentence of life imprisonment imposed following his conviction for conspiracy to rob a bank, bank robbery, and murder.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.