Martin Allen Johnson v. United States Bureau of Prisons United States of America

12 F.3d 1106 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Martin Allen JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS; United States of America, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35198. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 6, 1993. * Decided Dec. 15, 1993. Before: SNEED, NOONAN and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Johnson appeals a summary judgment for Warden Crabtree and an order striking Johnson's supplemental pleading. We affirm. 3 Johnson was a prisoner at the Federal Correctional Institution (FCI) in Sheridan, Oregon. 1 In 1991, he brought a civil rights action against the Bureau of Prisons and Warden Crabtree. He alleged that the prison violated his First, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights by denying him a vegetarian diet. The district court dismissed the claim based on sovereign immunity. We affirmed the dismissal of the claims against the Bureau and the United States and the Eighth Amendment claim against Warden…