Marte v. Chevron Corp. Long-Term Disability Plan

12 F.3d 1107 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Enriqueto MARTE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHEVRON CORPORATION LONG-TERM DISABILITY PLAN; Chevron Corporation Long-Term Disability Plan Organization, a Delaware corporation; and Chevron Corporation, Defendant-Appellants. Daniel Aruta, Earl Kauka, and Jacinto Almeria, Plaintiff Intervenors-Appellees. No. 92-15798. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 7, 1993. Decided Nov. 30, 1993. Before: THOMPSON and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges, and NIELSEN, District Judge. 1 MEMORANDUM 2 OVERVIEW Chevron Corporation Long Term Disability Plan [Chevron] appeals a district court grant of summary judgment for plaintiff, Enriqueto Marte, and plaintiff-intervenors, Daniel Aruta, Earl Kauka and Jacinto Almeria. The district court held that Chevron as administrator of the long term disability [LTD] plan under calculated the level of benefits due the plaintiffs [hereinafter Marte]. Chevron's appeal…