Ricky Lee Lincoln, AKA Richard Lee Lincoln Shelley Diann Lincoln v. James Rowland

Good Law
12 F.3d 1107·1993 WL 524148·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 36624
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 15, 199392-15545California419 words

Opinion

Opinion

12 F.3d 1107 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ricky Lee LINCOLN, aka Richard Lee Lincoln; Shelley Diann Lincoln, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. James ROWLAND; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-15545. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 6, 1993. * Decided Dec. 15, 1993. Before: SNEED, NOONAN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ricky Lee Lincoln and Shelley Diann Lincoln appeal pro se the district court's order dismissing this action against certain defendants and dismissing certain plaintiffs. We conclude that we lack jurisdiction, and dismiss the appeal. 3 A district court order dismissing some but not all of the defendants is not a "final decision" appealable under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . McGuckin v. Smith, 974 F.2d 1050 , 1053 n. 1 (9th Cir.1992); Patchick v. Kensington Publishing Corp., 743 F.2d 675, 677 (9th Cir.1984) (per curiam). Nevertheless, upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay and upon…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.