Herb Neft, and Keith H. Gill v. Vidmark, Inc., Baker & Taylor Video Mark Amin Barry Barnholtz

12 F.3d 1107 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Herb NEFT, Plaintiff, and Keith H. Gill, Appellant, v. VIDMARK, INC., Baker & Taylor Video; Mark Amin; Barry Barnholtz, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-56471. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 5, 1993. Decided Nov. 17, 1993. Before: HALL, WIGGINS, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellant Keith Gill appeals from the district court's order of sanctions against him under Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 and 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1927 (1988). This case was previously before this court in Neft v. Vidmark, Inc., 923 F.2d 746 (9th Cir.1991) when Appellant Gill appealed the district court's award of attorneys' fees and costs under 17 U.S.C. Sec. 505 (1988). We reversed this decision on the ground that Sec. 505 is not to be used as a means to sanction attorneys. Neft, 923 F.2d at 747 . On remand the district court ordered sanctions against Gill under Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 and 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1927…