Roger W. Knight v. United States

Good Law
12 F.3d 1107·1993 WL 501578·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 36618
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 3, 199393-35604California513 words

Opinion

Opinion

12 F.3d 1107 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Roger W. KNIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-35604. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 17, 1993. * Decided Dec. 3, 1993. Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Roger W. Knight, a noncustodial parent required to pay child support pursuant to administrative and court orders issued in the State of Washington, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of the United States in his action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief prohibiting the United States from enforcing the Child Support Recovery Act of 1992 ("the Act"), 18 U.S.C. Sec. 228 . The United States contends that the district court erred in assuming jurisdiction over this action because Knight lacks standing to challenge the Act. We review de novo the district court's determination that a party has standing, Polykoff v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.