Palmer v. Ellsworth

Good Law
12 F.3d 1107·1993 WL 498010·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 36612
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 1, 199393-35406California3,244 words

Opinion

Opinion

12 F.3d 1107 73 A.F.T.R.2d 94 -567 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Paul B. PALMER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Maurice O. ELLSWORTH; Robert L. Higgins; Stanley O. Leake; Mikel Williams, U.S. Magistrate; Harold L. Ryan, Chief Judge, U.S. District Court; Michael Griffen, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35406. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 17, 1993. * Decided Dec. 1, 1993. Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Paul B. Palmer, Jr. appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action against Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") agents Robert L. Higgins and Stanley O. Leake, Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel L. Hawkley, U.S. Attorney Maurice O. Ellsworth, U.S. Magistrate Judge Mikel Williams, U.S. District Court Judge Harold L. Ryan, and others arising from an attempted service of notice of seizure for Palmer's outstanding tax liability and his subsequent indictment and conviction on criminal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.