Morgovsky v. Creditors' Collection Service of San Francisco

12 F.3d 1107w NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Naum MORGOVSKY and Irina Morgovsky, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CREDITORS' COLLECTION SERVICE OF SAN FRANCISCO dba Premium Collection Service, a Corp.; Mark Love, individually and as President of Premium Collection Service et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16563. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 17, 1993. * Decided Nov. 29, 1993. NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION