Peter F. Melendez v. Arizona Department of Economic Security Arizona State Personnel Board

12 F.3d 1107 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Peter F. MELENDEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY; Arizona State Personnel Board, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15065. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 17, 1993. * Decided Dec. 1, 1993. Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Peter F. Melendez appeals pro se the district court's dismissal without prejudice of his action for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo a district court's dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Reebok Int'l, Ltd. v. Marnatech Enterprises, Inc., 970 F.2d 552 , 554 (9th Cir.1992). We affirm. 3 Melendez contends that the district court erred by dismissing his action because the district court "has jurisdiction over all state courts" under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1331 . This contention lacks merit. 4…