David Stanion v. Secretary of the Air Force

12 F.3d 1108 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. David STANION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-16379. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 17, 1993. * Decided Nov. 22, 1993. Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 David Stanion appeals pro se the district court's denial of his request for preliminary injunctive relief against the Secretary of the United States Air Force and others. 1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292 (a)(1). We will reverse the district court's denial of preliminary injunctive relief "only when the district court abused its discretion." Religious Technology Ctr., Church of Scientology Int'l, Inc. v. Scott, 869 F.2d 1306, 1309 (9th Cir.1989). 3 Stanion contends that the district court erred in denying his motion for a injunctive relief. We disagree. Rule 65(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that "[n]o…