Post Street Associates v. Deitz

12 F.3d 1108 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. POST STREET ASSOCIATES, a CA general partnership, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James DEITZ, Defendant-Appellant, v. DOUGLAS BALLUFF & ASSOCIATES, INC., Cross-claim-defendant-Appellee, Jean A. Deitz, Cross-claim-defendant-Appellant. No. 92-15946. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 8, 1993. * Decided Dec. 15, 1993. Before: TANG, TROTT and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 James and Jean Deitz ("Deitz") and their attorney Ronald Foreman ("Foreman") appeal the district court order granting $5,818 in sanctions against them for their violation of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. We affirm. 3 * We have jurisdiction in this matter because we consider the Stipulation of Dismissal, signed by the district court and filed on February 8, 1993, to be a sufficient final order. Although the notice of appeal was filed before the Stipulation of Dismissal, under Rule 4(a)(2) of…